Welcome to Mpix.com Community Sign in | Join | Help
Return to Mpix.com

in Search

Am I the only one noticing this?

Last post 07-24-2008 9:48 AM by Karenl39. 28 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (29 items) < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 07-23-2008 6:42 AM In reply to

    • gnrhaze
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-26-2007
    • Madison, Alabama
    • Posts 624

    Re: Am I the only one noticing this?

    This happened at my daughter's school.  They posted a sign saying so and so would be there and a certain date taking candid photos of the kids on the playground and the pics would be for sale if we were interested in buying them.

    So, I'm thinking one of several things:

    1.  This is a parent wanting pictures of the kids for their scrapbook and just offering them to the other parents for cost

    2   This is the school looking for updated pictures for their next brochure and offering them to the parents too

    3.  This is a photographer trying to break into the biz and using this as a promo

    WELL, we got the pictures - three little previews in BW on one sheet that was sloppily cut.  Mine, and all the other ones I saw, were of the child standing by a pole in the playground.  They were head shots only (not candid or lifestyle photos at all) and they were awful.  They had their payment sheet attached and I would not have paid a penny for those even if I couldn't take photos myself.  THEN to top it all off, there was a notice posted on the door of the school stating if the "proofs" were not returned then you would be charged $25.  I gladly returned mine (with no comments) but it just sort of irked me.  I don't know if you can tell that - LOL - but anyway.

    So go the days of our lives....We all have to start somewhere and some succeed and some don't.  I may not ever succeed either but at least that person tried I guess, maybe just a little too soon for such a big project.

    Rosemary

    Sony A700
    Zeiss 16-80mm f/3.5-f/22
    Sony 75-300mm f/4.5-f/5.6
    Tamron Aspherical 28-80mm f/3.5-f/5.6
    Minolta 50mm f/1.7
  • 07-23-2008 10:43 AM In reply to

    Re: Am I the only one noticing this?

    Karenl39:

     ... I have noticed recently that "everybody is a photographer"..

     

    Wink 

    "Somebody let the rabble in."  Lewis Carroll (famous for writing Alice In Wonderland he was also a dedicated wet plate collodion photographer) commenting on the sudden popularity of photography after the introduction of mass produced dry plates in the 1880s.  Wet plate photography required the photographer to make and process the plates in the field close to the time of exposure needing some sort of portable darkroom.  Dry plates were purchased ready to go, and could be processed at the end of a day of shooting.

     

    Article about when everybody became a photographer.  "By 1898 ... over 1.5 million roll-film cameras had reached the hands of amateur shutterbugs."  

     

    In 1900 when the Kodak Brownie went on sale for $1.  Film cartridges could be loaded in daylight, and processing and printing was available from local labs or by mail.  Suddenly photography, which had been fairly complicated and expensive, was within the economic and technical means of almost everyone.  In 1900 George Eastman was advertising that the Brownie camera and film made photography so easy that children could do it. 

    "Operated by any school boy or girl."

    "Any school boy or girl can make good pictures with one of the Eastman Kodak Company's No. 2 Brownie cameras."

     

    It seems to me that the popular perception is that digital photography is easier, and that's why more people are changing from casual snap shooters into serious photo enthusiasts.  In my experience creating a quality photo from digital actually requires more technical precision both in the exposure and processing stages than quality prints from neg film.  In general though, photography technology and processes became easy enough to learn for anyone who cared to apply themselves over 100 years ago, and have only steadily gotten easier.   I think the real reason digital has increased interest in photography is that it's more fun!   Being able to see the photo immediately and pop them up on a home computer can be very exciting and inspiring.   Consider the popularity of Polaroid; Kodak and Fuji wanted to get in on that instant photo craze too, but Polaroid kept them out of the market with patent litigation.  I've often heard/read a comment something along the lines of "Buying a piano doesn't make one a pianist.  Buying a camera doesn't make one a photographer."  Well, people actually are able to buy a modern camera, read the manual, and can often begin taking decent photos soon after.  At least decent enough to inspire the photographer.  I'll look at the photos you took the afternoon you bought your camera.  I don't want to hear your playing the afternoon you bought your piano.  Big Smile

     

     

    Business site  http://www.mattneedham.com
    Blog  http://www.henrypeach.com


    "...a lot of photographers think that if they
    buy a better camera they'll be able to take better photographs. A
    better camera won't do a thing for you if you don't have anything in
    your head or in your heart."


    -Arnold Newman


  • 07-23-2008 11:59 AM In reply to

    Re: Am I the only one noticing this?

    Yeah... I've noticed.

    Then I got to the comment on Wendi's baby's ticker and forgot all about it. Wendi are you readlly getting that desperate?


    -Patty

    Is what you're living for worth Christ dying for? .....Leonard Ravenhill
  • 07-24-2008 9:48 AM In reply to

    Re: Am I the only one noticing this?

     Matt,

     

    I love that.  Looks like this has been going on for ages.   

    Karen

    Show What You Want to Sell
    www.karenlynchphotography.blogspot.com
Page 2 of 2 (29 items) < Previous 1 2