|
Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Last post 08-18-2008 1:01 PM by Jeannie. 17 replies.
-
08-12-2008 11:28 PM
|
|
-
Moose


- Joined on 06-13-2006
- My own personal H E double hockey sticks
- Posts 5,826
|
Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Lens Selection, Perspective and Scale
In this Tutorial we will look at how to choose the right
lens for the right situation in order to achieve the look and composition you
want in your image with a foreground subject and a background. We will also
explore the scale of the subject and the perspective of it to the background
In this first set of images using some of my fine Object d’
Art from the Artist Tar’get’, I have keep the scale of the Vase the same through out all the
images. In other words the size of the Vase stays the same in each image even
though I am moving back from the vase but I am also changing Focal Lengths of
the lens to keep the vase in the same scale
Notice how though the scale of the Vase stays the same, the
scale of the Background changes and becomes smaller in perspective as I zoom to
a longer focal length.
One thing you should also notice but isn’t apparent in the images
(because I used f11) is The DOF around my subject remains the same through all
the images... Since I have used the same Aperture, that is out of the equation,
But as I change Distance to subject, I am also changing Focal length in the
same proportion, therefore keeping the DOF essentially the same.
The foot designation is camera distance to subject. The camera
is a Canon 20D 1.6X crop factor






In this second set, I attempted to keep the Background scale
the same (a little harder to do since I ran out of space even in a huge park)
But in this one, I would have the scale of the Subject change in each move
backwards and zoom in focal length.
In this example we can see how the perspective
of the Subject to the background changes. In the close up wide angle shots the
Vase looks much larger then the statue behind it. But as I move back and zoom
in the Statue begins to look larger then the vase and in the final image at
200mm we can probably see what is closer to the true perspective of scale of
the two objects.
In these you will also see how the distance between the
Subject and the Background becomes more compressed as we move back and zoom in.
And yes, that is a Horse’s Butt you are looking at… I
figured...if a Horse’s ass is gonna do this Tutorial…I may as well have a self portrait
included.






You can use this information and examples to choose the
right lens for the composition you would like. Is the background important and
big?…well then you may want a wider angle lens and getting closer to your
subject. If the background is un-important or maybe even distracting, you will
probably want to use a longer focal length and move away from your subject.
Moose Out
|
|
-
-
Eric L


- Joined on 04-11-2008
- Fresno, CA
- Posts 1,999
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Thanks Moose! I think this is one of the most valuable tuts so far! How did you get so accurate on keeping the vase the same size in the first series.
|
|
-
-
Moose


- Joined on 06-13-2006
- My own personal H E double hockey sticks
- Posts 5,826
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Thanks Eric  The first set, I had in a tripod and just eyed it and I used my Left Focus Point indcator to level the top of the Vase. The second set, I had to do twice cuz I screwed up the first time, so they were handheld and I was feeling flushed in the sun so long so I rushed though it 
|
|
-
-
drh681


- Joined on 01-10-2007
- Covina, CA
- Posts 1,981
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Moose:
The second set, I had to do twice cuz I screwed up the first time, so they were handheld and I was feeling flushed in the sun so long so I rushed though it 
it's the tin pot hat. it acts as an oven to cook your brain. 
Straw is much cooler and you can snack on it after the season. 
a very nice Exposition. 
...mischance nothing, thus idle woe.
all beer has food value... all food does not have beer value.
|
|
-
-
wayupnorth


- Joined on 10-01-2006
- Posts 2,585
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Thanks for taking the time! Really helps to see all these images together like this!
|
|
-
-
nrallens


- Joined on 07-07-2006
- North Royalton, Ohio
- Posts 2,353
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Yep, just like my Vietnamese teacher was trying to show me. Only without the accent and the ruler! I'm saving this for future reference. I did this with my mailbox at home. Thanks. deb
Love my MPIX family!!!!
You have my permission to play. Debi
|
|
-
-
LeighJ


- Joined on 08-15-2007
- Near Boston
- Posts 1,221
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Thank you, thank you This is one of the things I really needed.
Thanks, Leigh ++++++++++++++++++++++ "Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the present."
|
|
-
-
Moose


- Joined on 06-13-2006
- My own personal H E double hockey sticks
- Posts 5,826
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
OK, here is a Extra Point Riddle for you and you get super extra credit if you give two Photos showing it.(Exif must be intact)
In my examples, Both Cases. The Vase remained in the same place and the distance from the Vase to the Background was constant. The only thing that moved was the Camera/Myself and The zoom of the lens. The scale or perspective changed in every shot So here is the question. How would I Take two different Focal Lengths, say 18 mm and 50mm and get exactly the same shot. The same perspective, same scale. Two different Zooms. Can it be done?..can you do it?
|
|
-
-
Eric L


- Joined on 04-11-2008
- Fresno, CA
- Posts 1,999
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
I would think that the vase to statue distance would have to be shorter at 18mm, than 50mm. I'm not sure though.
|
|
-
-
Moose


- Joined on 06-13-2006
- My own personal H E double hockey sticks
- Posts 5,826
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Eric L:I would think that the vase to statue distance would have to be shorter at 18mm, than 50mm. I'm not sure though. That is half the answer but since it seems no one is even looking.. I will give it to you Good Going!
|
|
-
-
Eric L


- Joined on 04-11-2008
- Fresno, CA
- Posts 1,999
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Would it have to be 3.05 times closer? is that part two?
|
|
-
-
FIONA


- Joined on 01-05-2007
- Midwest
- Posts 2,232
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Holey Moley! i just saw this - wow! this is one of the few things i have always wanted to do but never taken the time to do it! :) THANK YOU SOOO MUCH!
this really helps me out! now i can "see" the relation. wow. you just made my whole weekend. I am gonna try to switch up lenses in my shoot this weekend and see how i can make this really work for me!
thanks mooosey!
“Travel by sea nearly approximates the bliss of babyhood. They feed you, rock you gently to sleep and when you wake up, they take care of you and feed you again.” Geoffrey Bocca
Personal Blog: "just nutty day to day stuff" http://adventuresofjenn.wordpress.com/
AKA jschreck-hugslut-cooklover
|
|
-
-
Grenache


- Joined on 10-01-2006
- Midwest
- Posts 2,909
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Moose: Eric L:I would think that the vase to statue distance would have to be shorter at 18mm, than 50mm. I'm not sure though. That is half the answer but since it seems no one is even looking.. I will give it to you Good Going!
This is an illustration of the concept called, "forced perspective" It is how the Lord of the Rings films were shot to make hobbits look smaller than humans without having to composite every scene. It is more complicated in motion picture though, because to move one element (camera, subject1, or subject2) you have to precisely move all three. Whether or not you like the movies, you should watch the making of feature on the Fellowship of the Ring just to help you think of photography differently. Combining Moose's excellent two illustrations and the extra credit question, you can then think how to balance the multiple variables of subject position relative to background and other subjects as well as focal length. Throw in the complexity of also wanting to blur or keep focused these different pieces, and then suddenly, Moose has forced us to think about being photographers rather than just go on a feel. When Ansel Adams was field testing extra large large format cameras (they would barely fit onto flat bed trucks), he had worked out where he wanted to shoot from in Yosemite to keep the subjects in the right relative scale before they ever loaded the camera on the truck. You don't have to put that much forethought in every shot, but few could quibble about his results. That is why they stand out from any other people's images of the same scenes.
Jim
"Civilization began with distillation." - Mark Twain
"There is very little that good wine and dark chocolate won't fix." - Me
Canon 20D, Canon 20D-IR Canon 17-40 f/4L, Canon 24-70 f/2.8L Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro, Canon 200mm f/2.8L II, Canon 1.4x Extender II, 580 EX Tons-o macro goodies Gitzo 1340 tripod w/ multiple columns Manfrotto 3275 Geared Head Manfrotto 488RC2 Ball head Manfrotto 685B Neotec Monopod
|
|
-
-
plane


- Joined on 07-25-2008
- Kansas
- Posts 65
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Moose:
Eric L:
I would think that the vase to statue distance would have to be shorter at 18mm, than 50mm. I'm not sure though.
That is half the answer but since it seems no one is even looking.. I will give it to you Good Going!
Trying to figure this out. I think the other half of the answer is that the camera needs to move closer to get the same shot with an 18mm. I think I came close to getting the same shot - I know they are not exact, but close. I also didn't have 18mm lens so I used 28mm and 80mm.
Here is my try:
#1 - camera is 5 feet from ball and 1.5 ft from box. 28mm
Nichole
|
|
-
-
plane


- Joined on 07-25-2008
- Kansas
- Posts 65
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
#2 camera is 12 feet from ball and 4 feet from box. 80mm
Nichole
|
|
-
-
Eric L


- Joined on 04-11-2008
- Fresno, CA
- Posts 1,999
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
plane:
Moose:
Eric L:
I would think that the vase to statue distance would have to be shorter at 18mm, than 50mm. I'm not sure though.
That is half the answer but since it seems no one is even looking.. I will give it to you Good Going!
Trying to figure this out. I think the other half of the answer is that the camera needs to move closer to get the same shot with an 18mm. I think I came close to getting the same shot - I know they are not exact, but close. I also didn't have 18mm lens so I used 18mm and 80mm.
Here is my try:
#1 - camera is 5 feet from ball and 1.5 ft from box. 28mm
That's probably it. I was thinking 50mm/18mm. And it looks like you got the pics to prove it.
|
|
-
-
Moose


- Joined on 06-13-2006
- My own personal H E double hockey sticks
- Posts 5,826
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
Excellent, Yes Thanks Jim (Grenache) for the Technical explanation of it and Plane for the Great example. Thank you too Eric for taking the time. Yes, In either of MY examples. The only thing I moved was Myself/Camera and my Focal length. The distnace of the subject to background remained the same. In the Extra Credit question, In order to get the same Image using two different focal lengths (no matter what they Happened to be) You have to Change, Both your Camera's Distance to subject AND your Subjects Distance to the Background. In Plane's example (Which assumes the Box is the subject and the background is the Ball ( we are taking the Garage door out of this) Not only with the change in focal length did they change the Distance of the camera to the Box, but they changed the Distance between the Box and the Ball. Now you will notice that there still is a difference in the two images (forgetting about the garage door) There is a difference in the Field of focus between the subject and the Background... And sometimes this is beyond Physics to over come. but there will be a few times that you could change your Aperture and therefore your depth of field between each Image to make the images look the same...but it is not always possible... In this example..actually it could not have been achieved even f the 28mm was wide open and then 80 was shot at Max aperture. This shows us that...we do need more then one fixed lens because not everything is possible Thanks everyone. Great job!
|
|
-
-
Jeannie


- Joined on 03-11-2008
- Brunswick, GA
- Posts 1,939
|
Re: Lens selection, Perspective and Scale
this is totally awesome!!!
|
|
Page 1 of 1 (18 items)
|
|
|